Add parallel Print Page Options

Now this Daniel was distinguishing himself above the other supervisors and the satraps, for he had an extraordinary spirit. In fact, the king intended to appoint him over the entire kingdom. Consequently the supervisors and satraps were trying to find[a] some pretext against Daniel in connection with administrative matters.[b] But they were unable to find any such damaging evidence,[c] because he was trustworthy and guilty of no negligence or corruption.[d] So these men concluded,[e] “We won’t find any pretext against this man Daniel unless it is[f] in connection with the law of his God.”

Read full chapter

Footnotes

  1. Daniel 6:4 tn Aram “looking to find.”
  2. Daniel 6:4 tn Aram “from the side of the kingdom.”
  3. Daniel 6:4 tn Aram “pretext and corruption.”
  4. Daniel 6:4 tn Aram “no negligence or corruption was found in him.” The Greek version of Theodotion lacks the phrase “and no negligence or corruption was found in him.”
  5. Daniel 6:5 tn Aram “were saying.”
  6. Daniel 6:5 tn Aram “unless we find [it] against him.”

Now Daniel so distinguished himself among the administrators and the satraps by his exceptional qualities that the king planned to set him over the whole kingdom.(A) At this, the administrators and the satraps tried to find grounds for charges(B) against Daniel in his conduct of government affairs, but they were unable to do so. They could find no corruption in him, because he was trustworthy and neither corrupt nor negligent. Finally these men said, “We will never find any basis for charges against this man Daniel unless it has something to do with the law of his God.”(C)

Read full chapter